Being subjective to someone is very offensive. It is going against the rights of humans, not considering the gender of an individual. Slavery is denying an individual the freedom to establish and live according to their heart desire. There has been a conflicting argument on the historical biblical take and the current slavery take concerning the rights of a master to his savants and whether it is acceptable. In general, there is a notable difference in the currents church clergy perspective and historical concern about slavery. The context explains giving differences and standing between the current forms of slavery in reflex to biblical take. From the two articles, it is evident that slavery has never needed, and it is so ill-fated that the aspect of slavery has now corroded the church relation, as explained below.
From the bible teaching to start with, the Old Testament there, the cultural heritage of Israelites, believed that slavery was part of their living. Abraham is considered as the father of faith and one of the highly honored savants of God. The wealth accumulation that Abraham had is cumulative of a human servant who is wedged as personal property. It is factual that some commons traits are associated with slavery. To start with, slaves are set to every rule that is directed to them by their master, and any time there is fail, the master has the full authority to punish.
For instance, it is inhuman for the act that Abraham was never caring for Hagar as he was not there to protect her after the miss understanding with her wife, Sarai. Abraham gave full authority to Sarai, saying that the maid is in her hand and had the full power to do anything in her power to punish her. After the analysis of the biblical treating of slavery, an argument arises in concern on the power people used to have on their helper.
From the evidence given and articles extracted from the bible, it is right to say that there was no one point when the bible condemned slavery. The exchange of human force for money was all over in the, and an example is the plotting of selling of Joseph by his brothers to the Egyptians. It is a clear indication that the trade of humans was legally accepted. The bible indicates that the master had the right to punish any of his servants, and even if death comes in between, there was no one to execute him. The characters of the highly ranked Gods servant to their slave brings a start of questioning God’s trait as he never showed interest in saving them.
More so, the demand by God to Abraham on circumcision of all male savants was a mare depiction of the draconian form of leadership. It is so because, at that time, circumcision was no man desired to make a painful decision. They had to accept as they were receiving orders from their master. In the conclusion of the text, both the new and the Old Testament speak of slavery, but there is no one time when the leaders showed a willingness to change and act in favor of the poor.
Switching from biblical historical slavery uptake, the argument persists where Stephen Symonds refers to church leaders as back bitters who are enslaving their followers. He had been in the front line of curbing slavery in his teachings. He explains the forms of slavery that church members usually undergo within the church bars by segmenting it into four.
First is the theft, which is the act of taking what is not yours. He explains that theft is morally not as right as at the same time, it is condemned in the Ten Commandments. Second is adultery, which is the disregard of requisitions that pertains to marriage. Under the acquisition, he explains how the slavery that is connected to prostitution with church clergy and how immoral the act is. To the ladies who are affected by the act, they view it as rape.
Man stealing is the next segmentation used in the article. It explains the act by which people are denied their rights to freedom and get owed by an individual. The act of kidnapping is a good explanation of the same. Lastly is murder, which is termed as mind act and not hand act. The historical significance of the two articles is showing that there is always the slavery living people where only slavery forms are changed. The current view of slavery is based on historical evidence. It is so as the people in the top social class have a belief and a feeling of being always severed. The notion is copied and grown as well in the current leadership formation that has affected the church also.
Are you busy and do not have time to handle your assignment? Are you scared that your paper will not make the grade? Do you have responsibilities that may hinder you from turning in your assignment on time? Are you tired and can barely handle your assignment? Are your grades inconsistent?
Whichever your reason may is, it is valid! You can get professional academic help from our service at affordable rates. We have a team of professional academic writers who can handle all your assignments.
Our essay writers are graduates with diplomas, bachelor, masters, Ph.D., and doctorate degrees in various subjects. The minimum requirement to be an essay writer with our essay writing service is to have a college diploma. When assigning your order, we match the paper subject with the area of specialization of the writer.
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH GRADE VALLEY TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT